Friday, February 7, 2014

Nation, the good and the bad

When time started, the man was free soul, all alone in the wild. With the ascending ages, when this species of man debated the fear of all possible negative impacts on him and his life, he decided to form groups, which constituted to villages, with a leader who was either by force or by respect, or by common rituals and belief, or by social harmony.  In our conquest to imagine the far good historical lives of our ancestors, we discover a nation was accountable to few hundreds, may be thousands of villages and a handful of cities, with a major capital, where the King would reside. To be unbiased this was a system for not just a century, it prevailed through ages. The King and his chosen ones would decide what, where, and when to do?  This was no concern to the commons, until the King would interfere in their personal business. Some places still exists where the King is still worshiped. Rolling the pages of the written history and the debated history we find barbarians, humanitarians, and till the Renaissance of Europe, where this myth breaking revolution started, be it about fallacy in the name of God or the King. Justified as it was because every human soul has it's right, left after whatever has been decided by God.

 Rousseau said it "Man was born free and he is everywhere in chains". A revolution started to end the tyranny on the basis of fallacy. Yes, a good one, it brought progress world wide as we see today. But, no great success comes without pain which is extreme to unimaginable. Great views are never welcomed so easily. Laid millions unaccountable for the sake of this revolution. Went  millions unsung in the book of time.

What we present day common do is go by the book and forget that like our whole life that we have been through, our history is same both good and bad, or far more than that. To, be realistic this world feeds on both good and bad. You do the good for the good and bad for the greater good (as per your belief), as for an atheist, even he believes in humanity. There is always a thin line between good and bad. Just a simple example - These days I am going through Driving classes, advised to be on my right side * condition applied, so does come every book on religion, every book on unbiased ethics. The problem arises when we keep searching for a straight forward solution. God himself never created something straight forward. He himself is the lord of both good and bad. He never created a system we rely on and never guaranteed it's success. If a person starts believing all good and no bad, then he/she should have had one eye, one hand, one leg, and that will not be the path to progress for sure. Human mind is unfathomable, just look back into our own righteous past, I have never been so righteous, but i was just to every decision i made, considering my environment, applied the good and bad (greater good), so do everyone of yours', and did so Jean-Jacques Rousseau, when he busted the bad disguised good prevailed in his time whether in the name of God, King, and the good. When we have a thin line between good and bad, now we still have a limit on both sides. To build a nation we have to put it's base on both good and bad, we need to accept the fact. If something is not that good, we need to see both ways and make it seem good. But, here our ability to judge things fail, we never compare our lives in an unbiased way. We see the bad and try to criticize and make it good, but we ignore our own bad habits. In the end, in our pursuit for good we end up with damages. Human life itself teaches so much, but still we need references, and whoever got references ignore their own life experiences.
Present day, people demands unconditional security for anything. Nature's own law to be abolished, demanding a heaven on earth.  Some nations have accepted it, but to fail. Here, I am not supporting the conservative world, nor the most developed one. Truth itself never is good or bad, nor ugly or beautiful, it's totality comes  in it's acceptance.

Saturday, December 28, 2013

The Age of Hypermedia

With the growing technology, within two decades, the face of the world has changed. The mode of communication had the most drastic changes encountered, then any other sector. At present, when we talk about hypermedia, it is a term in information technology, patented by innovators to a logical extension of the term hypertext in which graphics, audio, video, plain text and hyperlinks intertwine to create a generally non-linear medium of information (this is all the Wikipedia starts for Hypermedia).

But, here I would like to talk about an abstract form of the term Hypermedia. Starting with the days, when newspapers started flowing throughout the world, with single TV channel, or even a few, where an orator used to read up the daily important news, and the same channel would pipe shows, soaps, and create awareness, this wasn't the birth of media, this was when media was there, at it's best, and that's not now, Why? Don't get confused. PLEASE!

Let me jump to Hypermedia (this was abrupt). Two words Hyper and Media. I cited my opinion above, regarding Media. Now, what the word Hyper means? Searched in Google, its says- Having a very excitable or nervous temperament; high-strung, Emotionally stimulated or overexcited, Overactive; Overexcited. So, my abstract definition for Hypermedia is to transmit messages so as to excite the common, in  mass.

Here a Common is assumed to be a person, who is reserved to his lack of good decision making, lack of interaction to outside world, talks about corruption, but somewhere, somehow gets corrupted by environment (excluding human inclusively), a common lacks of almost everything. A common never like diplomatic decisions, he has no idea of greater good, hard work is acceptable; but limits on sacrifices.

When we sum up the combo of Hypermedia to Common, to be frank that's doomed development. A disaster in itself. If we look on to the dominated Media of the People's Republic of China, may be that's too harsh, and as it should be to control the world's largest population, but when we turn our head to the West (where everyone is believed to be, not just Common), media is sometime kept out of lots of controversial stuff (whether it be a shooting spree, or bombing places, information for media and by media is reserved). Hypermedia is just like trying teach some real chemistry to a bunch of philosopher, they will just nod their heads, and by the end; all messed up. Information should be be better served raw, uncooked, and avoided if it's indigestible, that might end up with a bad tummy. This includes biased news, which counts to Hypermedia as well.

Believe me, i have seen protest where the media shows people in numbers protesting, these are a crowd of a few dozen individuals paid for the day, taken up to various places rearranged in front of camera (so they don't look the same), and then the media takes on and publishes the news. I hail from a volatile region, and I would like to say all credit goes to Hypermedia. My region is still there safe and sound, my neighbors sleep peacefully like anyone. There is a limit to everything, else this place would have been heaven, and we all dead. I am alive better.

We talk about safe place, compare nations, region, when the fight should be within ourselves, to achieve, make things right, or make things seem to be right, realizing that there is no much right.

Everything is all OK, if things go good. But, for a greater good, hypermedia should be curbed.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

THE IDIOTIC ISSUE-3 IDIOTS Vs 1 DIOT


BEING 3 REPUTED FELLOWS OF B-TOWN AND 1 FAMOUS AUTHOR WITH THE HIGHEST TECHNICAL BACKGROUND ,IT'S DIGUSTING TO SEE THEM ENTERING INTO BRAWL OVER THE ISSUE OF RESPECT AND FAME WHERE THEY ALL GAINED HONOUR WITH THEIR EARNEST EFFORT IN THEIR WHOLE LIFE....
WELLTHIS CHEAP ATTITUDE HAS ONLY NEGATED THEIR COUNT OF HONOUR IN THE MINDS OF COMMON.HERE I NEITHER SUPPORTING EITHER AAMIR KHAN AND HIS FRIEND VVC OR HIRANI NOR AM THEIR TO SHOW SYMPATHY TO CHETAN BHAGAT.
ISN'T IT SHAMEFUL TO BUY STORY CONCEPT AND NOT GIVE THE WRITER HIS DUE CREDIT IN THE SHOW REEL.IF THIS SHOULD BE THEIR THEN WHY THE VALUE OF FUNGCHUK WANGDU IS AS A SCIENTIST WHEN HE SOLD HIS GRADUATION,BECAUSEANYONE COULD HAVE EASILY LURED HIM OF CHEAT HIM FOR HIS RESEARCH LIKE HE WAS LURED WHEN WAS ASKED TO BECOME RANCHODDAS CHANCHAD FOR STUDY.
WELL NOW AS FOR CHETAN BEING AN Ex-IITian AND Ex-IIM FELLOW AND THEN AS A FAMOUS AUTHOR THROUGH THE THE CAREER OF A BANKER,AFTER HAVING SEEN SO MUCH OF THE WORLD HE SHOULD HAVE ATTAINED SALVATION AND STAY HAPPY ENOUGH TO SEE HISNOVEL TURNING INTO A FILM,RATHER THEN PASSING BOGUS BLOGS AND MAKING A SILLY ISSUE.
AND WHY WAS AAMIR THEIR TO DEFEND THE AUTHENTICITY WAR.BEING A WELL-KNOWN AND HONOURABLE ACTOR HE SHOULD HAVE MAINTAINED HIS DIGNITY BY AVOIDIG THE TOPIC.HE DID HIS BEST IN 3 IDIOTS,BUT HE TURNED OUT STUPID.WELL, HE COULDN'T BE AN IDIOT ATLAST HE CAME OUT STUPID ALONGWITH CHETAN BHAGAT.SHOULD FUNGCHUK WANGDU HAD BEEN THEIR REALLY HE WOULD HAVE NEVER LET THIS HAPPEN.NOT TO FORGET HE IS A MYTH

Sunday, October 25, 2009

ARUNACHAL-ANOTHER DEBATE BETWEEN INDIA AND CHINA




It is of no concern to me to where and to which country, a part of land belongs to if humanity,peace and happiness exist in that part.
But,since time begun,and human race realized things,a battle was always there for the sake of land and this battle whether verbally or practically still exists.

Here i am pointing the cold debate had been always there since 1962 after INDO-CHINESE WAR,where Chinese troops infiltrated into the whole north-eastern INDIA . And in this modern era when CHINA needs a lot of resources to feed the millions,it has debate from a new beginning claiming ARUNACHAL PRADESH.

The Chinese have two major claims on what India deems its own territory. One is the western sector, is on Aksai Chin in the northeastern section of Ladakh District in Jammu and Kashmir. The other claim is in the eastern sector over a region included in the British-designated North-East Frontier Agency, the disputed part of which India renamed Arunachal Pradesh and made a state. In the fight over these areas, the well-trained and well-armed troops of the Chinese People's Liberation Army overpowered the ill-equipped Indian troops, who had not been properly acclimatized to fighting at high altitudes.

In this cyber era,Indian states like ARUNACHAL PRADESH has just started paining the nerves of the government.But,still as a brief description about the state,Arunachal Pradesh borders with the Indian state of Assam to the south and Nagaland to the southeast. Burma/Myanmar lies towards the east, Bhutan towards the west, and its boundary with the People's Republic of China to the north is disputed and the McMahon Line is not recognized by the Chinese authorities. Itanagar is the capital of the state. Although Arunachal Pradesh is administered as an Indian State, the People's Republic of China (China) and the Republic of China (Taiwan) claim portions of the state as South Tibet.The NEFA (North East Frontier Agency) was created in 1954. The issue was quiet during the next decade or so of cordial Sino-Indian relations, but erupted again during the Sino-Indian War of 1962. The cause of the escalation into war is still disputed by both Chinese and Indian sources. During the war in 1962, the PRC captured most of the NEFA. However, China soon declared victory and voluntarily withdrew back to the McMahon Line and returned Indian prisoners of war in 1963. It was the Chinese who did not advance farther and on November 21 declared a unilateral cease-fire. They had accomplished all of their territorial objectives, and any attempt to press farther into the plains of Assam would have stretched their logistical capabilities and their lines of communication to a breaking point. By the time the fighting stopped, each side had lost 500 troops.

India has a lot of it's territorial part under the possession of it's neighbor-PAKISTAN & CHINA.It tolls to 781140 sq km under PoK and 5180 sq km handed over to CHINA by Po K and 37555 sq km under China's possession.This is what on papers and under the same comes high altitude areas of ARUNACHAL.

Debate will be there over the topic and if it becomes inevitable possibly war will be there.No one,knows what will be the fate of this tribal state.People there are in no good condition (except government making some development in the recent post debate period) and things are uncertain to them even if CHINA wins it's claim over the remote-state;but one thing for sure to the state and it's dwellers is that for the time being they are just the rope used in tag of war .No one knows the complete truth,and even if one does he helds no honor to judge the fate of ARUNACHAL.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Management:It's necessity



There are many moments in our life when we realise that had we thought about the future or manage the thing properly.But,no we won't change our attitude for who cares about what was the past?


Who takes the responsibility? As whenever the case is regarding an individual the answer will,obviously he need not answer anyone....and if the case is relating to a company/organisation /system everyone will wash his or her hands off the matter saying "I am not responsible for that" or "I don't know anything regarding that"

Well the concern is much more when it comes to the latter ofcourse.Because , when the responsibilty to maintain and manage is bestowed on an individual; why he/she isnot able to answer for the same......he/she is paid for that.Many companies/private industry/organisations even in the government sector has ended in peril(e.g-Hindustan Machine Tool).

Bad Management is in itself the sole aiding factor to finish something.And,the something is each and every task we undertake.For a low level employee it is his each day labour to be executed in a proper manner,and for a mangement level employee it is to take the responsibilties and plan for the next day and task.So,if anyone related to this system will move back,failure of the company is more picturesque. It should be always maintained that,for a system to be running well,no cause should be inevitable.It is not our home and no boss is a father,uncle,aunt or mother or no employee is a son,nephew,niece or daughter....it is a business-the only relations should be that of boss,client,employee and colleague.... In this manner if the company have a hygienic hiring attitude, it will for sure have a strong employee pool in the company. By selecting quality people, and by providing solid training and opportunity, it will surely have success even at bad times. The staff will be the key to success, and not a drain of resources. In fact, an entire attitude change on everyone's part is in order. Instead of seeing the bad times, think in terms of the opportunities presented by competition.

Bad Management comes when emotional attachment crosses the walls of houses and reaches your work desk along with you,to make your cousin,brother,son,nephew and distant relations take a position neglecting the capable one.You already set a barrier in front of the systems progress .

It's the responsibility of the manager to ensure that the financial side of the operation is fit for purpose.Expected cash inflows and outflows should be monitored. Weekly or monthly rolling cash reports should be produced. Cash should be centralised or pooled across units.

You can't be certain of making sense of financial fundamentals without these simple checks; they both avoid traps and provide opportunities for profit.Managers have to ask themselves some difficult questions. How and why were bad management decisions taken? Why were defects and defective attitudes ignored in the past? What can be done to guarantee that correct management policies are pursued, regardless of the economic climate?

Habits and values must be altered so the whole company has the aim of eliminating waste and maximising all efficiencies at all times. Even excellent housekeeping won't provide a bright future unless crisis management involves every manager going beyond his or her daily duty.

During recession, most companies reduce their employment levels. Avoid conventional wisdom, and emerge from the recession as an innovative industry.Reduce salary rather than dumping staff and creating a cancer in the system. Being a unique driving force in the industry is so much more exulting and profitable than being a 'me too a follower'.


Sunday, August 30, 2009

THE NEED OF A NATIONAL HERO.....AND THE DECISION TO MAKE WHOME...

MOST DEBATED TOPIC NOW A DAYS IS MOHAMMAD ALI JINNAH,JWAHARLAL NEHRU ,MAHATMA GANDHI. THEY ARE OWN NATIONAL HEROES OF TWO RIVAL COUNTRIES.NO DOUBT;WHETHER THEIR IDEOLOGIES ARE TRULY CITED OR NOT.BUT, ONE THING FOR SURE IS ALWAYS MAINTAINED IS THEIR PICTURES,POSTERS,QUOTATIONS AND STATUES THAT ARE MEANT AND RESPECTED A LOT ALTHOUGH UNDERGOING MANY MANIPULATIONS OF THE REAL VALUES AND CHARACTER OF THE PERSON;BY SOME POLITICAL PLAYERS WITH MOTIVES .
THIS PARTICULAR THING IS CITED IN A MUST WATCH MOVIE CALLED "ENEMY AT THE GATES",WHERE IT HAS BEEN RIGHTLY SHOWN HOW A NATIONAL HERO IS MADE AND HOW HE IS COMPELLED TO ACT AS A PUPPET.TODAY WE SPEAK OF THINGS AND CARRY OUT SPLENDID TASK OF WELFARE AND TOMORROW THESE WORDS AND DEEDS BECOME HISTORY.THEN,THEY ARE METAMORPHOSED ACCORDING TO NEEDS AND DEMANDS OF DIFFERENT LEADERS TO EXCITE THE ORDINARY COUNTRY MEN.IN THIS MODERN HOURS WHEN FACTS ARE TRAVELING AT IT'S OPTIMUM SPEED,IT IS HARD TO HIDE THINGS TO MAKE THE IRRELEVANT,BUT STILL THERE ARE FORCES TRYING TO SUPPRESS THINGS,WITHOUT CONSIDERATION TO THAT WE HAVE GROWN IN OUR GENERATION AND THINKING'S,AS IT IS ALL ABOUT MAJORITY,MINORITY AND GUTS WHETHER WITH FOOLISH,CLEVER,SELFISH OR SOCIAL WELFARE ATTITUDE .


IT'S RIDICULOUS TO SAY THAT TODAY IN INDIA YOU WILL FIND SOMEWHERE AROUND,MORE THAN 30 CRORES COUNT OF CITIZEN WHO WILL OPPOSE(NOT OPENLY) THE PHILOSOPHY OF GANDHI AND WHAT HE DID FOR INDEPENDENCE;SAME AS IN PAKISTAN THE JOURNALIST HAMEED HAROON DEPICTED THE FACT THAT JINNAH'S IDEOLOGIES ARE KEPT BURIED.
COUNTRY BUILDING IS NEVER AN ACT OF TWO OR THREE FELLOWS.THERE ARE ALWAYS FIGHTERS WHO SHED THEIR OWN BLOODS OR REPUTATION FOR THE SAKE OF THEIR COUNTRY.BUT,DEPICTION OF THESE PEOPLE ARE MEANT FOR BOOKS ONLY AND NOT TO BE EXULTED,AS THEY ARE EITHER TOO OLD HISTORY,USELESS SACRIFICE OR WRONGLY PLACED TO THE WORLD AS A RESULT OF CONTROVERSIES.

THE NEED OF A NATIONAL HERO IS MUST BUT THINGS ABOUT HIM SHOULD NEVER BE FALSELY DEPICTED AS IT HURTS THE SENTIMENT AND SENSE OF PATROITISM.

THEY THINK LIKE ME